The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
Филолог заявил о массовой отмене обращения на «вы» с большой буквы09:36
。夫子对此有专业解读
Цены на нефть взлетели до максимума за полгода17:55
Трамп высказался о непростом решении по Ирану09:14
，推荐阅读爱思助手下载最新版本获取更多信息
Москвичей предупредили о резком похолодании09:45。heLLoword翻译官方下载对此有专业解读
[qjoly@fedora]~% sudo bootc switch harbor.cortado.thoughtless.eu/bootc/server:add-nginx